I. think: The purpose of this experiment is to determine the effects of varying weak intensities on an Elodea plant.
II. Hypothesis: As escape loudness increases, the rate of photosynthesis should increase.
III. Results
A. Data Table
| | | | | |Light Intensity (uM) |
Year |Semester | class |Group |Repetition |Ambient |40 |80 |clx | |2010 | lineage |1 |1 |NA |-0.66 |1.93 |6.94 |5.95 | |2010 | blood line |1 |2 |NA |-1.29 |2.09 |6.16 |7.69 | |2010 |Fall |1 |3 |NA |3.01 |2.79 |7.23 |7.79 | |2010 |Fall |1 |4 |NA |0 |2.29 |2.95 |3.55 | |2011 | take form |1 |1 |NA |6.5 |10.4 |18.5 |22.2 | |2011 | parachute |1 |2 |NA |9.8 |9.6 |9.0 |12.6 | |2011 |Spring |1 |3 |NA |8.5 |9.9 |34.0 |34.8 | |2011 |Spring |2 |1 |NA |0 |6.63 |14.3 |21.5 | |2011 |Spring |2 |2 |NA |0 |5.0 |3.78 |6.51 | |2011 |Spring |2 |3 |NA |0 |2.47 |5.95 |5.44 | |2011 |Spring |2 |4 |NA |0 |7.05 |10.3 |23.0 | |2011 |Fall |1 |1 |1 |0.78 |3.33 |20.5 |18.6 | |2011 |Fall |1 |2 |1 |1.65 |24.6 |5.25 |9.87 | |2011 |Fall |1 |3 |1 |1.71 |4.79 |5.04 |9.01 | |2011 |Fall |1 |4 |1 |1.88 |6.94 |12.35 |14.
28 | |2011 |Fall |1 |1 |2 |NA |4.62 |13.66 |4.2 | |2011 |Fall |1 |2 |2 |2.6 |21.7 |4 |9.21 | |2011 |Fall |1 |3 |2 |0.54 |2.49 |2.75 |8.9 | |2011 |Fall |1 |4 |2 |2.06 |7.145556 |10.14778 |12.50556 | | comely | | | | |2.06 |7.145556 |10.14778 |12.50556 | |
B. [pic]
Question 1: What information does the column chart abide on the relationship between light intensity and photosynthetic rate?
Lower light frequencies had a more conterminous effect than higher light frequencies.
Question 2: Does the chart provide information suggesting saturation of rate as a function of increasing intensity? Justify your answer.
Yes, the increased light intensity causes results in a slower rate of photosynthesis. This is because of the aquatic environment in...If you want to get a full essay, suppose it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment