DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES BETWEEN SPOKEN AND WRITTEN LANGUAGE:
Manner of mathematical product:
Spoken text is transient unless it is recorded. Therefore, it is imperfect and it is always feasible to do on-line editing
and negotiate meaning.
Written texts be relatively permanent and this enables them to be surveyed and consulted. These texts are the
products of copious drafts, which withdraw extensive checking and editing. The relative permanence of written
texts also allow them to be portable.
Contextual features:
The interlocutors share the same spatiotemporal context. Communication gum olibanum shows an on-line monitoring, which
benefits from the addressees immediate feedback and the abundance of contextual cues (visual clues much(prenominal) as body
spoken manner of speaking and gestures; auditory clues like diversity in tone of voice, hesitations, pauses, etc).
Written texts are decontextualised or autonomous as they cannot depend on the addressees contributions or on
early(a) contextual clues. There is no common situation, as in face-to- face interaction. The situation has to be
inferred from the text.
Also, the words need to set out all shades of meaning, which in spoken text are relayed by
paralinguistic cues.
Linguistic features:
The syntax in spoken language is typically less structured than that of written language; for example, spoken
language contains incomplete sentences, fragments of speech, and little subordination.
In written language the sentences are complete, and better structured with embedded clauses.
Similarities:
The main similarity between written and spoken language is that they are both utilise to transfer information from one party to another, either formal, or informal.
Word Count = 248
Reference = Dr. David Nunan 1993, (Discourse Analysis)If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment