What Is The Nature Of United States Hegemony?`

The Two-Fold Nature of the unite States HegemonyAfter the Cold War , the joined States emerged as the only world power with the economic and soldiery faculty to back it up . Hence , the international system is generally influenced by the decisions of this hegemon . However , we could see that even though the United States remains the strongest state in the world , it cannot fully agree out its impertinent policies unilaterally . It needs the cooperation of other states in the first place it can successfully complete its goals . Thus , the United States whitethorn be the only superpower , nevertheless its hegemony can live against it in a unipolar international system . The reputation of the United State s hegemony is two-fold - it is not only the superpower because of its military might , merely because of its widespread culture and economic forward motion as wellDavid Capie analyzed the relations of the United States with three southeast nations - the Philippines , Malaysia and Indonesia . All three countries expressed their support against act of terrorism , but their stances fluctuated and were heavily influenced with domestic interests . These states did not join together to subvert the aggressive tendencies and ease the power of the United States , but they as well did not jump into the bandwagon except for the Philippines , and even then the Philippine political science expressed limits on to what extent it was willing to assist . Also , the three states changed their positions after the aggressive action of the United States of attacking Afghanistan , and then waging war on Iraq . Whereas Indonesia started as halfhearted in its support for the United States war on terrorism , after the attacks on Afghanistan it started to express criticism against the use of strength and became firm on its criticism when the Iraq war came .

Similarly Malaysia strongly supported the United States war on terrorism , but when the US started flexing its military muscle Malaysia changed its tone and used the maneuver of violence as a leverage to round up local terrorist elements and to criticize US actions at the same cartridge clip preserving the regime s political stability in the country . In the case of the Philippines , its support faltered when the US released prematurely that it will be sending troops in the country without the Philippine government s sign , rousing domestic opposition that led to recanting the teaching and maintaining the forces will only be for training . It shows that the US has overestimated their walking(prenominal) ally s dedication , that it too needs to be balance domestic interests with foreign goalsThe instability of the governments in the Southeast and the passion of social breakdown in their societies is a great appertain of their leaders . The Malaysian , Indonesian , and Philippine governments all prioritize nation-building , or at least , maintaining the peace in their respective(prenominal) regions and consequently securing their regime s continuing legitimacy . The United States should be able to take these states domestic concerns in drafting foreign policies and in courting allies The positions that states take are influenced by both international and domestic factors , and...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper