ConclusionThe claim that science and religion ask radically several(predicate) kinds of questions andsupply methodically different sorts of answers : Scientists , it is averred , ask how things pop off , whereas theologians ask why they occur . Scientists offer accounts that showfunctional or causal connections among phenomena , but theologians supply reasons forthe indwelling world and all its processes and interconnections . Scientists qua scientists arlimited to tracing disposition s interconnections , but ghostlike thinkers seek the underlyingreason or purpose ultimately responsible for nature . It is impossible for inquiries limitedto the raison d etre of nature to conflict with investigations limited to ingrained phenomenahence religion and science cannot possibly contradict each former(a) Basically , we believe Religion is based on religion while Science is proof Since thebeginning of time , we have our aver beliefs and we based it on the Word of idol throughthe Bible .
It says , God created the world and all the living creatures on it , stated in theBook of Genesis . On the other hand , Science believed in the Evolution of Mankind . Nowthey can create humans by cloning humans . When there are calamities Religion says weare reminded by God while Science says calamities are made payable to environmentalaspectsIn reality , they are not compatible because Science has it s knowledge concept ofexistence . But when you think about it , Science or scientists should be closer to ReligionScientist should feel closer to God because they are the one s who are unlocking themysteries of His creations...If you want to get a wide-eyed essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment