EVIDENCE AND VERDICT OF SIMPSON CASE

It wasn't a matter of savvy . . . [or] favoritism. It was a matter of that assure" (Cockburn 27; Adams A26). Even if unrivaled makes the debatable assumption that their reactions were representative of the entire jury, only a superhuman jury could have avoided being influenced by the immense and unprecedented media publicity given to trial. Nicole Simpson and her friend, Ron Goldman, were slain on June 12, 1994. The finding of fact was rendered on October 3, 1995. The jury was sequestered for 266 days, but its members were exposed to the media safety blitz for more than 9 months and through conjugal visits were at least(prenominal) partially aware of what was being express outside the motor inn during their sequestration.

Media attention was guaranteed by the lurid nature of the crimes and Simpson's celebrity status. nearly of the pre-trial publicity tended to point toward Simpson's guilt, as did some of his own actions, much(prenominal) as his bizarre escape attempt which resulted in the bronc chase and his suicide note. At the same beat, Simpson's favorable substitution class as a sports star and his genial television and characterisation personality were re-emphasized. OJ was in the minds of many, particularly blacks, an icon, a stirring prototype of how far a black with humble origins could go in American society. Public opinion polls taken bef

"Behind the verdict." Economist 7 Oct. 1995: 27-28.

A great deal of testimony was offered by both sides concerning whether Simpson had had the time to drive to and from Nicole's condo, commit the crimes and get dressed for his planned stage business flight to Chicago. Whatever the perpetrators may have planned, Goldman's unexpected arriver narrowed, if the killer was OJ, his margin for error. The ambiguous testimony of Kato Kaelin and the more probable testimony of limo driver Allan Park showed that Simpson probably had just enough time, but the accounts of Nicole's neighbors as to when the crime actually occurred, when they comprehend Nicole's dog barking, etc., varied by 20 minutes or so.

The slowness of the coroner's office in arriving at the crime outlook prevented a more exact determination of the time of the ii deaths. It appears that the jury, which asked for a replay of Park's testimony, was uncertain concerning the timeline up to the last minute. In a revealing comment, white juror Anise Aschenbach said that she thought "Simpson probably did it," but was troubled by this evidence (Boyer & Woo A3). The timeline evidence probably was not decisive, one manner or the other.

Cockburn, Alexander. "Beat the Devil." Nation 30 Oct. 1995: 27- 32.

Adams, Lorraine. "Simpson Jurors Cite gutless Case, Not 'Race Card.' New York Times 5 Oct. 1995: A1 & A20.

The decision by Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti to file charges against Simpson in LA primordial rather than in Santa Monica, the district in which the crime occurred, guaranteed that the jury would have a higher proportion of minority participants and a higher percentage of less educated and lower income members (Bugliosi 61).

The ordinary consensus that the prosecutors were out washed-out and outmatched by the Dream Team may be exaggerated. The County spent $10 million on the case (Cockburn 27). Going into the trial, the crook trial experience of the two sides was roughly equivalent (Bugliosi 34-43).

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!