Law and Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Law and Morality - Essay ExampleWorking in a multitude obviously has its advantages and its disadvantages the advantages that you gain from workings in a group is that more and more ideas can be floated and worked upon and this was certainly the case with our group all(prenominal) one contributed to their fullest and the environment was a competitive one w present every one wanted to show their cognition and use it for the betterment of the team, apart from floating of ideas in that location was also a case of people having superior knowledge than those of the different components of the group and this was certainly put to good use and helped the whole unit. Since we had divided the group into sub groups so that we may work on dissimilar topics and perspectives each and every one had variant responsibilities but every one felt a shared responsibility towards the group, this helped us immensely in position forward our case because every one had a clear cut target to achieve a nd there were no ambiguities in any ones goals and hence there were no ambiguities in the results that each and every member of this group achieved. Then there were definitely the problems that one had to face within the group as puff up because there could never be perfect coherence between people when they work in a group because every one has a different take on every notion or topic and every one has a different ways of inferring things from reading material, this obviously created some issues amongst the group initially but were tackled soon after we decided to divide the group into sub groups, one thing should be kept in mind here that although we had divided our selves into sub groups the group worked together, if a group member was to be picked up at random and asked about any part of the debate the member would definitely be able to answer because this whole debate was a well worked out team effort. The other problem that we faced initially was that members had to be convi nced that the betterment of the group is in their own interest and hence any information that they come up with should be shared with the group and not hoarded up for individual betterment. Then there was also the issue that some members were reluctant or they didnt have the right chemistry to communicate with each other and the division of the group into sub groups went a long way in removing this barrier in the flow of information flow. Over all the experience of working in a team was a good one because I personally enjoy socializing and getting to know different perspectives and also to act with people who have a higher knowledge base than yours is an experience altogether where you learn a lot about various topics and how to deal with problems in difficult situations and different conditions.DebateThe theories that we applied for the purpose of this debate were the theories of dworkin and specially the work where he criticized the work of hart on the clean implications of law and morality, dworkin states that the moral principles or the moralities that people hold so close to them are more often wrong and since the justice system makes use of these moral principles these laws are flat some times incorrect based on the biased or prejudiced views of the society on the whole or a large cluster of the society, therefore if a society views prostitution as malicious then the law should not treat it as unlawful the law should be total and should not look at it from the